DLF

Smith College Libraries Reflections from the DLF Forum 2015

This Contribute post/Forum Update was provided by Elisa Lanzi, Director of Digital Strategies and Services (@LanziElisa), Brendan O’Connell, Instructional Technology Librarian (@brendan0connell), and Jasmine Jones, Metadata and Technical Services Archivist (@jmjones27), at Smith College Libraries

Elisa Lanzi, Director of Digital Strategies and Services

This was a signature year for Smith College and DLF.  First, we joined as new members in the initiative to encourage liberal arts colleges to become part of the “robust and diverse community” that is DLF. We jumped in head-first as our new instructional technology librarian presented at the Liberal Arts Colleges Pre-Conference. And the stars really lined up when we heard that our new Metadata and Technical Services Archivist was awarded an ARL + DLF Forum Fellowship for Underrepresented Groups.

I had attended DLF for the past two years as the sole Smith College participant. This year it really made a difference to have the three of us focus on different parts of the program. We absorbed three times as much content! These two colleagues, Brendan O’Connell and Jasmine Jones, are joining me in this post (below).

After this year, I consider DLF my go-to conference. As Director of Digital Strategies and Services at a small college I deal with everything from hardware deployment to user experience to repositories.  The mix of different sizes and types of schools at DLF provides that broad swath of experience applied to the increasingly complex entity we call the digital library.

When Cecily Walker (Assistant Manager for Community Digital Initiatives & eLearning at Vancouver Public Library) said, “interdisciplinary, not neutrality is desired” in libraries, it gave me a framework for thinking about our upcoming library renovation.  “What does it mean to be doing work like this in this time?” asked her co-speaker, Chris Bourg (Director of Libraries at MIT).  Their reflections were my take-aways as we at Smith engage in the process of re-imagining our library at a 21st century women’s college.

Brendan O’Connell, Instructional Technology Librarian

The LAC pre-conference provided an outstanding opportunity to hear and see digital library peers at liberal arts colleges begin to define features of our community of practice and what makes us unique (and thus worthy of our own preconference!)

It’s perhaps too early (and maybe will always be too early) to define this community, but what features were on display during the preconference?

As an Instructional Technology Librarian at Smith, much of my work is focused on close collaboration with faculty on incorporating technology (broadly defined) into course design and how library resources can be leveraged to accomplish their pedagogical goals. On this level, I learned about lots and lots of cool tools that I’ll be sharing with my faculty, including Mirador, a powerful image comparison and annotation tool from Stanford that leverages the International Image Interoperability Framework.

More importantly, though, I continued to learn how to talk about tools and technology and incorporate discussions of the designed nature of digital systems with students and faculty. Safiya Umoja Noble’s keynote address, “Power, Privilege and the Imperative to Act”, presented her work on how Google’s search algorithms have reinforced existing racist and sexist representations of black women. In response, I would hope that our digital library community of practice and development can be a place where we continue to resist and critique mainstream digital design, but also to use our digital library skills to engage in creative action that develops alternatives to these systems.

Jasmines Jones, Metadata and Technical Services Archivist

Smith College Libraries is in the early stages of building its digital program, so I saw our participation at both the LAC pre-conference and DLF Forum as a means of not only connecting Smith to the individuals and institutions who we see as models for digital initiatives, but also as a way to think deeply about the implications–technical, organizational, social, pedagogical, and environmental–of the infrastructure we are planning to implement across the Libraries and Special Collections. It was clear–in the keynotes, sessions, and closings of both the LAC pre-conference and the Forum–that the services and technology that we provide our users must be girded by value-laden decisions and, as I described in another DLF blog post about the Forum, that we should think about “what it means to be ethical and meaningful in praxis and how to ensure inclusivity when developing services for our communities.”

As the first Metadata and Technical Services Archivist of the newly integrated Smith Special Collections, I think a lot about systems: our move from old to new; metadata wrangling and migration; the integration of the physical and digital; and streamlining processes, in order to develop program-based, rather than project-based, work. It might be no surprise, then, that I see metadata as one of the core functions of the work that we, as information professionals, do. I believe this sentiment, of metadata as a core function, was shared by those who participated in voting for the conference program, given the robust offerings of sessions about metadata. Metadata is one of the simplest ways that we can build relationships with our communities and facilitate access to our materials in a way that is thoughtful, meaningful, and inclusive. It’s the bridge to our communities, the bridge between systems, the bridge between collections, the bridge between legacy and the new. And because it is the bridge for so many things, we need to continue to be critical about how metadata is created, who is involved in the creation of it, and the standards that govern its creation. My take-away from DLF wasn’t any one tool or workflow, though the ones shared were awesome; it was that we need to think, create, and work with intention and be mindful of the impact of our work on the communities that we serve.